The Case Against Reality
Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes
Impossible d'ajouter des articles
Échec de l’élimination de la liste d'envies.
Impossible de suivre le podcast
Impossible de ne plus suivre le podcast
Acheter pour 22,62 €
Aucun moyen de paiement n'est renseigné par défaut.
Désolés ! Le mode de paiement sélectionné n'est pas autorisé pour cette vente.
-
Lu par :
-
Timothy Andrés Pabon
-
De :
-
Donald Hoffman
À propos de cette écoute
Can we trust our senses to tell us the truth?
Challenging leading scientific theories that claim that our senses report back objective reality, cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that while we should take our perceptions seriously, we should not take them literally. How can it be possible that the world we see is not objective reality? And how can our senses be useful if they are not communicating the truth? Hoffman grapples with these questions and more over the course of this eye-opening work.
Ever since Homo sapiens has walked the earth, natural selection has favored perception that hides the truth and guides us toward useful action, shaping our senses to keep us alive and reproducing. We observe a speeding car and do not walk in front of it; we see mold growing on bread and do not eat it. These impressions, though, are not objective reality. Just like a file icon on a desktop screen is a useful symbol rather than a genuine representation of what a computer file looks like, the objects we see every day are merely icons, allowing us to navigate the world safely and with ease.
The real-world implications for this discovery are huge. From examining why fashion designers create clothes that give the illusion of a more “attractive” body shape to studying how companies use color to elicit specific emotions in consumers, and even dismantling the very notion that spacetime is objective reality, The Case Against Reality dares us to question everything we thought we knew about the world we see.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
©2019 by Donald Hoffman. (P)2019 Brilliance Publishing, Inc., all rights reserved.Vous êtes membre Amazon Prime ?
Bénéficiez automatiquement de 2 livres audio offerts.Bonne écoute !
Ce que les auditeurs disent de The Case Against Reality
Moyenne des évaluations utilisateurs. Seuls les utilisateurs ayant écouté le titre peuvent laisser une évaluation.Commentaires - Veuillez sélectionner les onglets ci-dessous pour changer la provenance des commentaires.
-
Global
-
Interprétation
-
Histoire
- Muriel Bassett
- 06/09/2020
A glimpse of the next paradigm
This book is opening a door on a totally different view of our world in my opinion. Everything sounds plausible but probably not acceptable yet by the main stream. Loved it.
Une erreur s'est produite. Réessayez dans quelques minutes.
Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !
-
Global
-
Interprétation
-
Histoire
- Paul
- 31/08/2021
Sorry but that's definitely not a good book
This book is disapointingon so many levels. I was fascinated by the premise. Indeed, I still assume it is true. What we perceive as "reality" is surely a mental construct created from what information evolution has crafted our brains to register and attend to. So the question is, How different is this objective reality to what we think is there? The author claims there is no correlation, it's totally different. But, and here is my criticism. He provides no evidence at all.
All he provides is an equation, which he says "proves" his point. Now, having quoted many eminent physicists and philosophers at length who disagree with his ideas, he gives no explanation of where this equation comes from, what evidence exists to show it might be true. Not one comment by anyone who might disagree with it. Good popular science books never say "and this proves my theory is correct". Rather, they show lots of evidence to hopefully convince the reader. Instead of this, the author simply repeats himself ad nauseam. Sorry, I do not wish to sound rude, but the first six chapters, amongst other things (which never enlighten or back up his argument) repeats what he says in the preface. I can't help but suspect that the space given to alternative theories was simply due to a need to pad out the book.
When theorists have evidence, they flaunt it. Simple as that. The author has an interesting idea, but not the evidence to justify a book.
Une erreur s'est produite. Réessayez dans quelques minutes.
Merci. Votre vote a été pris en compte.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation !